16ga.com Forum Index
Author Message
<  16ga. Ammunition & Reloading  ~  wad shot cup shorter than shot charge
shouseal
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:35 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 52
Location: Michigan

Is it important that the entire shot charge fit inside the wad's shot cup? For example, the Gaulandi SG 16 wad will load 7/8 and 1 ounce loads but the shot cup holds only 3/4 ounce of shot. If I'm loading 1 ounce loads is it a problem that 25% of the shot is not protected by the plastic sides of the shot cup - especially if I'm shooting it in a Browning sporting gun with ported barrels? (The DR 16 wad holds only 3/4 ounce of shot also, while the CB 16 holds 1 1/8 ounce). Thanks.

_________________
Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mike campbell
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:36 pm  Reply with quote
Member
Member


Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Posts: 1338

Rolling Eyes


Last edited by mike campbell on Sun Aug 11, 2019 1:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
16gaugeguy
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 3:29 pm  Reply with quote
Member
Member


Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 6535
Location: massachusetts

Most domestic one piece plastic wads originally designed by or for Remington, Winchester, and Federal hold most of the designated shot load but rarely all of it. A few layers of shot usually end up a bit above the rims of the cup when inside the hull. These exposed layers of shot will usually settle back into the cup when the load is fired and the wad and shot charge exit the hull. Some recommended loads allow for a considerable amount of shot to be exposed above the rim of the shot cup. However, the loads' overall performance usually warrant this. We see this mostly in magnum loads with extra heavy shot charges.

I personally prefer my selected wads to have shot cups which hold and protect as much of the designated shot charges as possible when I'm using heavier shot charges of bigger shot sizes in my 16 gauge (and other sub-gauge) hunting loads designed for bigger birds. I want as many of these big pellets to exit the bore in a good round shape so they have a reasonable chance of remaining in the patterns out at longer anticipated ranges. This is why I prefer to use Remington SP16, Winchester clones, and the now obsolete Herter's 16 ga, 1-1/8 ounce wads for most of my heavy duty 16 ga. hunting loads.

I also prefer the R16, one ounce wad or the Winchester clone for all of my 1 ounce hunting loads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gil S
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 3:40 pm  Reply with quote
Member
Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2008
Posts: 1943
Location: Lowcountry Ga.

If you examine the wads after shooting them, you'll notice that the top of the wad rarely has shot indentations. The overflow shot most likely ends up in the wad on setback.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sneem
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:55 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 477

Several commercial shells are semi-transparant. If you look at them closely, you'll see most don't contain all the shot within the cup.

_________________
Many places remain undiscovered. Some because no one has ever been there. Others because no one has ever come back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT - 7 Hours

View next topic
View previous topic
Page 1 of 1
16ga.com Forum Index  ~  16ga. Ammunition & Reloading

Post new topic   Reply to topic


 
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB and NoseBleed v1.09