| Author |
Message |
| < 16ga. Ammunition & Reloading ~ Differences of 16 ga wad dimensions in certain areas. |
|
 Posted:
Thu Oct 31, 2024 3:18 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 1947
Location: Central ND
|
|
You guys are both pessimistic, (and a bit daffy) at least about the fit of Gualandi and B & P wads in any of the current hulls. They fit and they work flawlessly and there is nothing marginal about it.
Smiling here!! |
_________________
Mark...You are entitled to your own opinion. You aren't entitled to your own facts. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:07 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 850
|
|
MSM
Yes it works. But not as we think of it. Remember believe some but question everything. Old 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Mon Nov 04, 2024 9:19 am
|
|
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 1947
Location: Central ND
|
|
Hammer Bill,
You know, I have gotten into a lot of these types of conversations and about 99% of the time no one will admit that they should take another look into their statements so instead of taking pictures, pointing out the facts and wasting a lot of my time during hunting season, my response is.....
Flattened ball powder is approximately .012" thick (W572 and Longshot.). The I.D. of a RIO 16 gauge hull, which has the largest I.D. of any current hull I could find is .675". The O.D. of an SG16 wad is .667. The O.D. of an Z2M16 wad is .666.
How any current powder will migrate past either of these wads is a mystery to me, especially after 30 lbs. of wad pressure along with a properly applied crimp is added into the equation.
I promise not to respond to this thread again. |
_________________
Mark...You are entitled to your own opinion. You aren't entitled to your own facts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
