| Author |
Message |
| < 16ga. General Discussion ~ WSF powder for 16 gauge target load? |
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 11, 2026 8:27 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 798
Location: Indiana
|
|
I bought some WSF at a LGS for $39.95/lb. and started with a load of 18.4 grains with a CB 16 wad and Winchester primers. The load works ok but is a little stiff for my arthritic body, so I switched to a load using 17.8 grains of WSF. Again, that works ok but I'm still a bit bothered by the recoil. I'm wondering about a load using the #16 bushing in my MEC Jr., giving 16.2 grains of WSF and the aforementioned components. I'm using the black Remington Game Load hull because I have a lot of them.
Would 16 grains work ok or is that too light?
Would appreciate opinions from those who use WSF, thanks. |
_________________ One Man with Courage is a Majority
---Andrew Jackson |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 11, 2026 9:13 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Posts: 427
|
|
Uhm... I don't see where you said the shot payload? Need that and which cb16 wad, the cb0100-16, or the cb0078-16? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2026 4:27 am
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 2530
Location: West MI
|
|
Perusing the spread sheets I see about 4 dozen loads in various hulls for WSF and very very few 7/8 (none lower) most 1-1.125oz and of those use 20-24grns in the 8-10k PSI and 1160-1220FPS ranges and only a couple/few go over 10k. Tells me WSF is a heavy lifting powder and reducing may be a dirty but not dangerous affair. Be cognizant of bloopers in very cold weather.
only this one for RGL...
Rem Plastic 1 oz. WSF 21.5 Rem 209P Rem SP-16 1282 10500 Lymans 5th
I can't imagine how trying 16grns, bloopers aside, would get you in trouble, worth a.... shot : )
That shared, I find Brewsters11's conclusions about 16ga target loading interesting, see below link and read or scroll down to B11's post on 5.23.25.
http://www.16ga.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25823&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 |
_________________ Sorry, I'm a Duck Hunter so shouldn't be held strictly responsible for my actions between Oct 1st and ice up. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2026 5:43 am
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 1819
Location: Central Missouri
|
|
Perhaps one should consider and respect old wood , old eyes , old age.
I have proven for years with multiple thousands of game animals taken with 3/4 oz or less 5/8 oz and even 1/2 oz with choke .
Those light loads at high velocity are LETHAL on game from woodcock to Turkey and Geese.
Why on earth would anyone want to run the casino odds , old wood desinagration, detached retina, ECT . ECT.
Thinking more shot is going to compensate for poor pointing skills is simply expenditures of resources.
I know folks like to think that it increases their odds of taking game , well loading loads that doesn't hurt your gun nor yourself and being cheaper allows one to develop something you have to cultivate , muscle memory or skill set.
I took a Doctor to the Dakota's for 4 years before he put a pheasant in the bag , now Dave is a very solid shooter high B , low A class at Trap and grew up hunting pheasant.
I watched him turn roosters sideways over and over with a 12 ga. Citori with #4's even Peach couldn't recover the birds by the time I got to him with little ole Peach.
The year 4 we were coming by Scheels, stopped in Dave spyed a 16 ga . Citori , I checked the barrels out they looked regulated and straight with all the stock fit dimensions looking good for Dave .
I called Mike Lowery ( Skeetex ) asking him if the serial number fell in the good range , he confirmed it was.
I convinced this Doctor to shoot 3/4 oz #9's on the next trip up , he filled his game bag with not a crippled bird , doing this on consecutive trips as well.
Now I simply am attempting to help educate with WHAT WORKS 100 % of the time, learned and not hurt the the one doing the shooting.
Regards Nick |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2026 7:36 am
|
|
|
Joined: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 202
Location: Colorado
|
|
| Keep up the good work, Nick. It’s been a long time since I’ve shot anything but 3/4oz loads in my 16’s. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2026 7:45 am
|
|
|
Joined: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 2174
Location: canandaigua - western n.y. (formerly deerhunter)
|
|
| Hey Nick , I think in this case , that WSF just isn't the right tool for the job for lite loads . Love it for my 28ga stuff , but it is probably more in the Unique burn area . |
_________________ Molly sez AArrrooooooah ! |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2026 8:28 am
|
|
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 2166
Location: Central ND
|
|
| Nick, I have seen you post about the virtues about 1/2 and 5/8 oz. loads, but I have never seen the reloading data for them. Where can we get that data? |
_________________ Mark...You are entitled to your own opinion. You aren't entitled to your own facts. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2026 11:21 am
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 15 Dec 2009
Posts: 230
Location: eastern oregon
|
|
Here is a load that was tested by precision reloading:
fiocchi hull 2 3/4 and primer
dr16 wad
26 grains green dot
5/8 oz lead
15 gauge overshot card
6 point crimp
average velocity 1738 fps sd 25
average pressure 11440 sd 909
temperature 70
24 grains green dot was 1643 fps
9645 pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2026 11:45 am
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 798
Location: Indiana
|
|
OK fellows, sorry for omissions; to clarify:
I'd be loading 1 ounces of shot. The wads used are CB0100-16 from Claybuster.
Reasons I'm using WSF:
1. It's one of the few powders available without going through the hassle of online shopping, shipping, hazmat etc.
2. At $39.99/lb. it's fairly sensibly priced.
3. I can also use it for my 20 gauge reloads.
In view of the above, the 16.2 grains of WSF in the black Rem hull seems reasonable to me. Further thoughts?? |
_________________ One Man with Courage is a Majority
---Andrew Jackson |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2026 1:49 pm
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 1819
Location: Central Missouri
|
|
Sorry Mark :
I was not addressing the powder .
I was addressing the stress on the old wood and the physical constraints of the human physiology.
I was addressing the effectiveness of small charges of small shot at higher than accepted standards.
When one can only get due to availability a certain powder then that is the girl one dances with.
Reduction of a already kicking load to a level that is acceptable to the human physiology , reduces the effectiveness on living organisms we intend to kill.
This is exactly why I am always hesitant to offer any contribution to a thread unless it is directly related to myself.
Mike used to chuckle with delight when I did make a comment , I simply cringe at the rebuttal.
Mark you of all people know why I cannot visit on load data , as well as you of all people know how to work up a load that you want to test.
When one shoots an autoloader the world is different than a fixed breach gun that is a 50+ year old gun .
Having taken way in excess of 500+ folks to the Reservation over the years ( actually it's just shy of 1K ) I have had the finest research study that has ever been conducted concerning the use of shotguns, loads, styles, abilities , ECT ECT, on live quarry.
Like I told Ash Goodwin all of those years ago when he was hitting 30+% of Ariel targets ( I can make you shoot good but I simply can't make you look good , you will have to go to the other crowd to make you look good)
Ash's transformation to 90+% hits on flying targets is what I do.
Styles, clothes, boots to make you look good is not my venue.
Enough for now , back to shooting to keep up my skillset.
Regards Nick |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2026 3:02 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 798
Location: Indiana
|
|
| Thanks for totally hijacking the thread and IGNORING my original post, Nick. |
_________________ One Man with Courage is a Majority
---Andrew Jackson |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Tue Feb 17, 2026 5:41 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 13 Jun 2009
Posts: 705
Location: WA/AK
|
|
| I have been loading the compression formed Winchester/Western 16-gauge Dove & Quail or UPLAND hulls with a Winchester 209, 20.5 grains of WSF, WAA-16 or later CB-16 and 1-ounce of shot for nearly 45 years. It might have been 473 when I started! The Winchester manuals showed 20-grains going 1165 fps and 21-grains going 1220 fps. In that my bushing throws 20.5-grains and I'm always striving for 1200 fps, that seemed good to me. I load 7/8-ounce with the DR-16 wad in the purple Federal hulls. |
_________________ Share the knowledge |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 18, 2026 5:50 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 798
Location: Indiana
|
|
Researcher---I am using a load that seems workable---1 ounce lead shot, 16 grains of WSF, a 16 gauge CB0100-16 wad, Winchester or Cheddite primers and a black Remington Game load hull. Shot a round of skeet with this load out of a 16 gauge Citori Gran Lightning last weekend; no bloopers and broke 23/25 with it first time out.
Not sure of the velocity but it was relatively easy on recoil. |
_________________ One Man with Courage is a Majority
---Andrew Jackson |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 19, 2026 5:20 am
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 2530
Location: West MI
|
|
| Looks as though 16grns is working for you. Be interesting to know how dirty or complete the burn is? And if someone at your range has a chrono, what's its clocking at? |
_________________ Sorry, I'm a Duck Hunter so shouldn't be held strictly responsible for my actions between Oct 1st and ice up. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 19, 2026 1:39 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 798
Location: Indiana
|
|
| The 16.2 (to be exact) grain load of WSF does admittedly leave some residue in the barrels, but not bad. A skeet buddy had a chronograph last week at the club but I shot all my reloads up before I knew he had one on site. I'll have to get the load chronographed in the next couple weeks. I was curious about that too. |
_________________ One Man with Courage is a Majority
---Andrew Jackson |
|
|
|
|
 |
|