| Author |
Message |
| < 16ga. Ammunition & Reloading ~ Hodgdon 572 Loads |
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 21, 2026 1:32 pm
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 1574
Location: Minnesota and Florida
|
|
Would some of you fellows who have either submitted loads to places like Precision Reloading or Tom Armbrust, or have been involved in testing themselves (Mark - MSM2019 for one), comment on the trustworthiness of Hodgdon's posted load data. I have used their data "forever" and had no problems or reason to distrust it.
In the last couple of years, due to the on-going powder availability situation, I have been switching to Winchester 572 for my 28 and 20 gauge skeet loads. The data seems reasonable. I notice they now have data for 572 in the 16 for 7/8 ounce loads from 1100 to 1250 fps. These loads seem attractive for use in my dainty damascus double, as pressures seem quite low. What's your take on the accuracy of Hodgdon's data. Have you any experience to corroborate it? Thanks for anything you can provide.
Cheers!
Tony |
_________________ "Knowing how things work is the basis for appreciation, and is thus a source of civilized delight." - William Safire
"One man’s “magic” is another man’s engineering. “Supernatural” is a null word." - Robert Heinlein |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 21, 2026 5:34 pm
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 3526
Location: Illinois
|
|
| I have used this powder in 28 hulls(Fiochi)20's-Remmy and 16''s-Remmyand W/W with no problems.Offhand can't remember can't recall powder charge. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 21, 2026 6:59 pm
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 713
Location: Too far south in New England
|
|
The only problem I’ve encountered with 572 is hull separation after 2-4 reloads on Activ hulls. Recipes were based on straight hulls. I cannot comment on pressure but all loads with 1oz have worked fine and seemed to be in band for velocity based on limited chronometry.
Due to the hull separation issues I sold the remaining 6 lbs I had. I have a few loads left of my original reloads and I use them to cycle my newer A5 on doubles. |
_________________ "You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means" - Inigo Montoya |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 21, 2026 10:42 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 2180
|
|
Max Smoke,
The velocities were OK with the few loads I tried and ran over my chronograph.
I don't know about the pressures but two things stand out. The first is that W572 with 1 oz. loads using the Hodgdon data, except for the Remington SP (RGL) hull data, none of the loads have the correct wad column heights. The second and this may or may not be of concern to everybody, the cold weather performance is lacking in most of the 1 oz. and 1 1/8 oz. loads I tried. Anything from velocities dropping off around 10% and worse, to very off sounding loads that watching the shot cloud and wad barely go 20 yards. In 50 degree plus weather the loads that fit were fine.
Obviously living in ND makes solid cold weather performance important, as I am sure you know.
Because of the poor cold weather performance I never did send any loads in to be tested.
I have gone to N320 and 3N37 for my 7/8, 1 and 1 1/8 oz. loads. |
Last edited by MSM2019 on Sun Feb 22, 2026 5:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 22, 2026 5:22 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 184
Location: Grampian, PA
|
|
Via Hodgen 2019....
2.75" Cheddite hull, Cheddite 209, 20.5 gr 572, sg-16 wad, 1204 fps @ 6300 psi. I use a 1/4" 28ga felt wad for correct stack height. I've had no weather-related issues Grouse hunting, but if it's 12 degrees, I'd probably stay home....... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 23, 2026 6:14 am
|
|
|
Joined: 30 Sep 2015
Posts: 693
Location: NEW SALISBURY INDIANA
|
|
| I don`t trust hodgdon data, seems they developed it using math rather then real testing. When working up a load using universal powder, their data said to use 20 gr for 1165 fps, but when I tested it the recoil was real hard and my chrony said 1300 fps. I tested some factory target loads that said 1165 on the box and thats what the chronty said. Soooo I called them and they said my chrony was not good enough to test even though it agreed with the box, so reduced my load to 17 grs and got 1165. |
_________________ 16ga 3-Win 37
16ga Ithaca 37 1946
16ga Western Auto Revelation
16ga Marlin 90 1939
16ga browning citori lightning grade 3 2003 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 23, 2026 7:19 am
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 1797
Location: Minnesota
|
|
| Ive had same happen with a HS6 20ga load. By Their data was supposed to be 1200 but I chronoed it at 1330 |
_________________ Great dog, Great friends,Great guns |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 23, 2026 8:23 am
|
|
|
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 184
Location: Grampian, PA
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 23, 2026 5:24 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 184
Location: Grampian, PA
|
|
One more try
2.5" Cheddite hull, SG-16 wad, Cheddite 209, 15/16 oz of #8 shot, 19.5 gr Win 572, 6 point crimp, 6 shot average of 1232 fps @ 6252 psi
Tested at Precision Reloading 03-07-2023
Work sheet # 030723X
Works great in my short chambered guns |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 25, 2026 7:10 am
|
|
|
Member

Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 1574
Location: Minnesota and Florida
|
|
Thanks very much Tom Shaffer. Good data.
My use is much the same as yours: Damascus hammer gun by Ladislav Svestka of Prague with 65 mm chambers. It's a very delicate island (peninsula) lock thing with 29.5 inch barrels (75 cm) that have little fine-wire gold inlays at the breech and muzzle ends. Gunmaker's name is also gold inlaid.
Cheers!
Tony |
_________________ "Knowing how things work is the basis for appreciation, and is thus a source of civilized delight." - William Safire
"One man’s “magic” is another man’s engineering. “Supernatural” is a null word." - Robert Heinlein |
|
|
|
|
 |
|