Author |
Message |
< 16ga. Ammunition & Reloading ~ Cheddite Wads |
|
Posted:
Sun Apr 12, 2015 9:51 am
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 1550
Location: Minnesota and Florida
|
|
I refer you to "Reloading for Shotgunners" by Fackler and Macpherson, 4th edition.
- Fackler is the founder and owner of Ballistic Products.
- At the time "Reloading for Shotgunners" was written, Ballistic Products was the only company retailing Gualandi wads.
- "Reloading for Shotgunners" contains loads right next to each other for both the Activ G-28 and the BPSG16.
- The BPSG16 was Balistic Products' designation for the Gualandi wad and still is.
So answer this: Why would the fellow that was retailing the Gualandi wad list loads in a book he wrote, with a wad that was the same as the wad he was selling, but with a designation from another seller? Further, why then, if the wads were the same, were the ballistics reported for the loads different? Pretty solid evidence, along with the info from Lyman 4th ed. that the wad referred to as the Activ G-28 in the Low Pressure Group spreadsheet, as well as in Lyman, and in Fackler & MacPherson's "Reloading for Shotgunners", 4th ed., is not a Gualandi.
Nope, we don't yet know who made the Activ G-28 referred to in Lyman 4th ed and "Reloading for Shotgunners", 4th ed., and sold by Graf's as "Cheddite CH1628". We do know that Activ put that wad as well as the Gualandi wad in their factory loads at one time or another. But that's not the issue. The issue is whether the wad listed in the reloading books as the Activ G-28 is a Gualandi wad, and from the above, it clearly isn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 13, 2015 7:32 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 401
Location: Tennessee
|
|
MaximumSmoke wrote: |
I refer you to "Reloading for Shotgunners" by Fackler and Macpherson, 4th edition.
- Fackler is the founder and owner of Ballistic Products.
- At the time "Reloading for Shotgunners" was written, Ballistic Products was the only company retailing Gualandi wads.
- "Reloading for Shotgunners" contains loads right next to each other for both the Activ G-28 and the BPSG16.
- The BPSG16 was Balistic Products' designation for the Gualandi wad and still is.
So answer this: Why would the fellow that was retailing the Gualandi wad list loads in a book he wrote, with a wad that was the same as the wad he was selling, but with a designation from another seller? Further, why then, if the wads were the same, were the ballistics reported for the loads different? Pretty solid evidence, along with the info from Lyman 4th ed. that the wad referred to as the Activ G-28 in the Low Pressure Group spreadsheet, as well as in Lyman, and in Fackler & MacPherson's "Reloading for Shotgunners", 4th ed., is not a Gualandi.
Nope, we don't yet know who made the Activ G-28 referred to in Lyman 4th ed and "Reloading for Shotgunners", 4th ed., and sold by Graf's as "Cheddite CH1628". We do know that Activ put that wad as well as the Gualandi wad in their factory loads at one time or another. But that's not the issue. The issue is whether the wad listed in the reloading books as the Activ G-28 is a Gualandi wad, and from the above, it clearly isn't.
|
I just went down to the loading cave and looked at the single bag of factory Activ G28 16ga wads that I have remaining, and it most certainly IS a Gualandi SG16 wad. I have 10k+ Gualandi's and these are identical. I also have approx. 1k Cheddite CH1628 16ga wads so I know what those look like.
If the loads listed in the reloading books used the same wads as my bag of factory-packaged Activ G28 wads, then your statement that it 'clearly isn't' is wrong.
Just more confusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Mon Apr 13, 2015 8:42 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 1550
Location: Minnesota and Florida
|
|
Thanks Roadkill -- I don't doubt Activ changed to the Gualandi wad. That seems quite clear -- both have been found in Active factory loads, and you and others have seen they have both been sold by Activ as a reloading component. I am a little surprised they called the Gualandi by the same name as they applied to wad that is the one sold by Grafs as the Cheddite, but it is easy to imagine why Activ did that. I am not arguing against the fact that Activ gave the same label to both brands of wads.
The point is, whatever you call it, the wads from Grafs sold as Cheddite CH1628's and CH1632's are the same as the Active G-28's and G-32's shown in Lyman 4th ed, and they are different from Gualandi's. Further, those wads do load with different internal/external ballistics from Gualandis, as shown in Fackler and MacPherson's "Reloading for Shotgunners", 4th ed.
The original poster's question was on loads for the Cheddite wad. Such load data does exist in "Reloading for Shotgunners" by Fackler and Macpherson, 4th ed. as well as in Lyman "Shotshell Reloading", 4th ed, and in the Low Pressure Group's spreadsheet. It is different from loads using Gualandi wads. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:37 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 401
Location: Tennessee
|
|
I don't have Lyman's 4th to compare pics but the Gualandi SG16 and the Cheddite CH1628 are indeed radically different. Hard to imagine that they would not load differently!
Just as an aside, I have no use for the 1K Cheddite CH1628's that I have, I load strictly 3/4oz loads in 16ga and these have too much capacity for me. Anyone have any SG16's they want to swap? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:23 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 6535
Location: massachusetts
|
|
From the Graf & Sons website:
CHEDDITE WAD 16ga 1-1/8oz 500/BAG. Item #:CH1632 (B 500 count bag) Price: $14.99
I tried to copy and paste the picture of this wad. Not happening. Best go to Graf's website and view them for yourselves. They do not look like Gualandi or B&P wads. They do not resemble the obsolete Active wads either. They are much simpler in configuration than any other Euro wad I've ever seen.
I suspect the CH1632 wads are specifically an industrial item and are not marketed by Cheddite as a reloading component except through a special agreement with Graf & Sons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:00 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 22 Aug 2011
Posts: 1498
Location: the Moosehorn
|
|
This horse is still dead! |
_________________ ALWAYS wear the safety glasses
If you take Cranberries and stew them like applesauce they taste much more like Prunes than Rhubarb does ----G.M/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:23 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 759
Location: Somewhere in the Socialist State of Minnesota
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:57 am
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 6535
Location: massachusetts
|
|
oldhunter wrote: |
|
Thanks oldhunter. That's the one. The Activ G-32 is considerably different than the original Activ wad pictured in your previous post from April 9th.
I found a couple of long forgotten bags of original 1-1/8 ounce Active 12 ga. wads in the very bottom of my misc. stash carton. They are tan colored and have the exact same configuration of the one pictured in your post from April 9th. These old wads are from before the original Activ company went under and was purchased and reorganized. I don't know if Activ offered any of the original type wads in 16 ga., but I'll bet they did. I know they offered them in 20 ga., because I have a few of them on hand as well. I got these old Active wads well before I started reloading 16 ga ammo.
My hunch is the new Activ company contracts out a lot of it's production overseas. Their 16 ga. ammo seems to be constructed with whatever 16 ga. wad is available through whatever contractor is hired for a given production run.
It's understandable why things can get confusing, but we should all remember that all factory 16 ga. shells being produced today are designed for single use. The hulls are not designed to be reloaded, and the particular wads used in them are not often available if at all. I think we are lucky to have the various 16 ga. wads offered by Down Range, Claybuster, and Remington all things considered. Just how it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 21, 2015 1:44 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Dec 2010
Posts: 11
Location: Central SD
|
|
Not to stir things up any more, but this would be nice to have in the good ole US of A.
http://www.siarm.com/index.php?cPath=2_24_32_43
I see that there are 4 new Cheddite wads added to thier site at the beginning of this month. Maybe they will make it to this side of the pond sometime soon.
Ah! Italy!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Tue Apr 21, 2015 1:51 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 28 Aug 2014
Posts: 924
Location: Eastern Tennessee
|
|
Wow. All those wads! |
_________________ 16' Brown A5
15' Brown White Light Citori
13' Brown Upland Spcl BPS
02' Rem 870 Exp
53' Rem 870 Wing
53' Mar 90 DT
50' Mar 90 DT
47' Rem 31L
46' Win 12 (2)
33' Rem 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:54 am
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 6535
Location: massachusetts
|
|
Thanks 8W7M0 for an excellent heads up.
Click on this for the image of a wad which might be a very good one:
http://www.siarm.com/public/images/CONT_12_41_AZ21_cal_12_.jpg
This wad looks to be extremely similar to the Remington 12 Ga. STS Figure Eight target wads. I know from experience the Figure Eight STS wads produce some of the most uniform ballistics and excellent patterns I've ever gotten from any target wad I've ever used. A 16 ga. figure eight type wad which fits Cheddite type hulls might be just the ticket for 22 to 24 gram loads. The shot cup might need a filler wad or two for these light loads, but who cares if the performance is there. I'd love to get my hands on some to try them out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|